Over the past four years, the Trump administration has undermined international climate efforts by aggressively supporting fossil fuels. Domestically, Trump has essentially repealed or weakened all major regulations that should encourage the shift away from oil, gas and coal to cleaner energy sources. It eliminated Obama-era rules that require low-carbon electricity and cars. It has expanded drilling and mining opportunities. Under the terms of the agreement, the United States would have to wait only one month after submitting its intention to reinstate the agreement before formally rejoining the agreement, although it would lose some of the privileges of the short time the country withdrew from the agreement; For example, they would not be able to attend important meetings until they are members.  Even without the U.S. government, the electricity sector has shifted away from coal to cheaper natural gas and renewables, contributing to the decline. But cuts beyond what rhodium projects have in mind would likely require new rules and incentives from the government. Foreign coverage of Trump`s announcement was extremely unfavorable. An official with Britain`s The Guardian newspaper said the decision was unlikely to slow renewable energy growth, suggesting that „a much more likely victim of Trump`s election is the US economy, which he is supposed to protect.“  The British newspaper The Independent noted the „tension between myth and reality“ in Trump`s retirement speech.  The German tabloid Berliner Kurier headlined „Earth to Trump: Fuck You!“ („Earth to Trump: Fuck You!“).   Trump held a press conference in the White House rose garden in June 2017 when he promised to leave the deal, saying it was unfair to the United States, which would leave the deal and then begin negotiations to take it back or a new deal „on fair terms for the United States.“ On the day of Trump`s planned withdrawal, 25 companies published a full-page open letter to President Trump in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal encouraging the administration to keep the United States in the Paris Agreement.   The companies were: A proposal submitted by BNP Paribas Asset Management secured a 53% majority in Chevron – it called on the oil giant to ensure that its climate lobbying work is in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement.
„The role of the United States in this process cannot be overstated,“ she said. „In mathematics, the deal doesn`t work if the U.S. doesn`t do its part.“ On June 1, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. would cease all participation in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and begin negotiations to resume the agreement „on fair terms for the United States, its businesses, their workers, their people, their taxpayers,“ or to strike a new deal.  In withdrawing from the agreement, Trump declared that „the Paris Agreement will undermine (the U.S. economy)“ and „permanently disadvantage (the United States).“   Trump said the withdrawal would be in line with his America First policy. Although the agreement was signed in December 2015, it did not enter into force until 4 November 2016, 30 days after at least 55 countries, representing 55% of global emissions, ratified it. „The EU Green Deal and the commitments of China, Japan and South Korea to climate neutrality underline the inevitability of our collective transition to fossil fuels,“ said Laurence Tubiana, one of the architects of the Paris Agreement and now Executive Director of the European Climate Foundation. And she points out that the overall message of withdrawal is bleak, given the extent to which climate change is already demonstrating its destructive power. „This comes at a time when we have just seen Typhoon Goni crash to the ground in the Philippines; We saw Hurricane Eta, the 28th named storm of the Atlantic hurricane season in 2020; We`ve seen that Colorado and California have had the worst wildfire seasons since records began. At a time like this, it`s really a bitter moment to withdraw from the Paris Agreement.
It`s a shameful outing,“ Cleetus says. Trump, however, could not leave the deal immediately – he can only do so after the November election, in a peculiarity of timing. Others hope that the U.S. withdrawal will foster a sense of unity among others and produce new leadership. The official goal of the agreement is to prevent the world from getting 2C hotter than before industrialization. But its goal is to limit warming to 1.5°C, a best-case scenario that scientists see out of reach. „I think they cover their bets to see what kind of better deal they can get out of it, and they don`t really back down.“ The United States will officially withdraw from the Paris climate agreement on Wednesday, three years after President Donald Trump announced his intention to exclude the country from participation in the global forum to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The German auto industry has expressed concern about its ability to remain competitive in the face of the U.S. decision to pull out. Matthias Wissmann, chairman of the German automotive industry lobby group VDA, said: „The regrettable announcement by the US makes it inevitable that Europe must enable a profitable and economically viable climate policy in order to remain internationally competitive.“  Other countries have various security, economic, and diplomatic reasons for working with America to resolve issues of mutual interest. Withdrawal from the agreement will not change that.
„What Obama did at the end of his second term was fundamentally undemocratic to sign a Paris agreement without going to the Senate and Congress, and instead to do it by executive order,“ said former UN climate chief Yvo De Boer. „The absence of the United States in the Paris Agreement did not stop the momentum in the long run, but it slowed it down — and put the United States at a disadvantage,“ Larsen said. Neither argument is a convincing argument for staying in the agreement. But U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement is not yet over. The U.S. could choose to return, and Democratic candidate Joe Biden has vowed to join the deal „on day one“ if he wins the election. If it did, the United States could officially resume its role under the Paris Agreement in mid-February. The threat of withdrawal was widely seen as a stripping of the country`s responsibility for its role in the warming that has already occurred. The United States had withdrawn from the Kyoto climate agreement years earlier. The United States is now the only major country in the world that is not abiding by the agreement, which aims to prevent global temperatures from rising more than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) above pre-industrial temperatures. That`s no surprise — President Trump announced his intention to leave the deal in 2017 and began the process in November 2019.
But the move is in line with Trump`s agenda to scale back efforts to combat climate change in recent years, said Kate Larsen, a climate-focused analyst at Rhodium Group. „The international community has already experienced this twice. We have twice withdrawn from a climate agreement that was largely designed around us. This will make them cautious before negotiating with us again,“ Larsen said. The formal withdrawal has also reopened old wounds to climate diplomats. „We have actually worked very hard to ensure that every country in the world can join this new agreement. And by losing one, we feel like we`ve fundamentally failed. Many U.S. cities, states and businesses have also pledged to significantly reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the coming years.
Twelve states and at least 165 U.S. cities plan to get 100 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, according to the climate monitoring group America`s Pledge. Others say the U.S. withdrawal is partly due to the Obama administration`s failure to get the Paris Agreement ratified by the U.S. Senate. Despite the Paris Agreement, it is on track to become 3°C warmer. People are already suffering from what they have done to disrupt the climate. And even more warming will trigger more intense heat waves, faster sea-level rise that will flood major cities, and more extreme weather disasters that will weigh on government responses. No country may refuse to leave the agreement before three years have elapsed from the date of ratification. Following the president`s announcement in 2017, a number of states and companies pledged to further reduce carbon emissions and try to offset the federal government`s decision to withdraw from the U.S.
commitment under Paris. Global temperatures are rising quite predictably in response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations. This means that there is an ultimate limit to the amount of extra carbon we can put into the atmosphere if we want to meet temperature targets: in other words, a carbon „budget“ that we must stick to. The agreement did not specify the exact details of the budget, so each country had to develop plans to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions over time. These conditions require countries to update their commitments every five years from 2020 to make them more ambitious. Staying in the deal would have prevented the U.S. from backing down or even honoring the Obama administration`s initial commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent. A Washington Post/ABC News opinion poll of American adults conducted June 2-4, 2017 found that 59 percent opposed Trump`s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, and only 28 percent supported it.
Asked about the impact of the withdrawal on the U.S. economy, 42 percent said it would hurt the economy; 32% believed it would help the economy; and 20% thought it wouldn`t make a difference.   The poll showed a clear division between party lines: 67 percent of Republicans supported Trump`s decision, but only 22 percent of independents and 8 percent of Democrats supported it.  It was also bad for the countries that remain in the agreement. .